Plastic Bag Bans – A Bad Idea Whose Time Has Come

Oh goodie, yet more virtue signaling from our friends on the left, this time bans (Wasilla) and proposed taxes (Rep. Andy Josephson (D, 17)) on plastic bags used in stores.

Wasilla City Council voted a couple weeks ago to ban single-use plastic bags.  Rationale was similar to that of other Alaskan cities Homer, Bethel, Cordova, and Hooper Bay, that they pose a risk to wildlife and are an unsightly blight on the landscape (non-biogredable).  Homer rescinded its ban.  http://mustreadalaska.com/wasilla-bans-plastic-bags-josephson-tax-rest/

Green mouthpiece Rep. Andy Josephson (D, Dist 17) proposed HB 264 for the upcoming session which will tax (it’s always a tax with these guys isn’t it?) disposable shopping bags (paper and plastic) 20 cents per bag.  Nothing like being small-business friendly, is it?

It is always difficult to top virtue signaling with actual facts in the persuasion game, but let me try:

Plastic bag bans will make your life more dangerous.

There.  Does that get your attention?  Here’s why.

Reusable bags are not sanitary.  They are difficult to wash and otherwise clean, so people for the most part don’t clean them.  Over time, they pick up bacteria carried by produce and raw meats purchased in stores.  This in turn, increases your exposure to such niceties as bacteria like e-coli, coliform and MRSA, molds and yeast, all of which increase bacterial skin infections, allergic reactions, asthma attacks, and ear infections.  64% of reusable bags contain bacteria.  30% of them have higher bacteria counts that what is considered safe for drinking water.  40% of them had yeast / mold.  Many people use reusable bags for other purposes like carrying dirty diapers and gym clothing, because they are reusable after all.

A 2012 Institute for Law and Economics paper entitled “Grocery Bag Bans and Foodborne Illness” found striking correlations between San Francisco’ plastic bag ban and increased deaths and emergency room visits related to foodborne bacteria.   http://blogs.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/SSRN-id2196481.pdf

Single use bags have none of these health issues. Either do reusable bags at the first use.  Subsequent uses are another thing entirely.

Advocates point to environmental positives of these bans, none of which are supported by data.  For instance:

  • Paper lasts longer in landfills. Biodegradable plastic may be an option, though never discussed when these bans are imposed.
  • Plastic’s carbon footprint is smaller.
  • Bans trigger a move to other disposable plastic bags for the same use (trash bags, garbage bags, trash can liners)
  • Reusable bags much be purchased by the shopper, increasing their costs
  • Reusable bags are not reused. In Austin, there are almost as many reusable bags at its recycling centers as there were when single-use bags were used.
  • There is an environmental cost with cleaning and drying the reusable bags that is never considered.
  • 95% of reusable bags come from overseas; most of them from China.
  • http://greenliving.lovetoknow.com/Why_Should_We_Not_Ban_Plastic_Bags

Additionally, bans end up harming businesses, especially retail businesses.  In Los Angeles, following its ban in 2011, every single store inside the ban area had to terminate some of its staff.  None of the stores outside the area dismissed staff.  Stores inside the ban area decreased their employment by 10%.  Stores outside the area increased their employment by 2.4%.  http://www.ncpa.org/pub/st340

So a plastic bag ban or tax is virtue signaling at its worst.  Not only does it limit freedom, but it also increases your chances of picking up a foodborne illness, and harms business by forcing layoffs.  And we are doing all of this for what?  To feel good about ourselves during the worst jobs market here in Alaska since the late 1980s?

This is yet another time where the cost of doing something is far, far greater than simply leaving Alaskans alone to live their lives in a manner that they see fit.

Alex Gimarc lives in Anchorage since retiring from the military in 1997. His interests include science and technology, environment, energy, economics, military affairs, fishing and disabilities policies. His weekly column “Interesting Items” is a summary of news stories with substantive Alaska-themed topics. He is a small business owner and Information Technology professional.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.